Notebookcheck Logo

EU energy label: Here are the best- and worst-performing tablets and smartphones

The iPhone 16 Pro Max failed to achieve an "A" rating. (Image source: Apple, edited)
The iPhone 16 Pro Max failed to achieve an "A" rating. (Image source: Apple, edited)
The EU energy label for mobile devices aims to provide an overview of the energy efficiency, battery lifespan, durability and repairability of smartphones and tablets to help consumers make informed purchase decisions. Whilst some devices managed to earn top marks, flagships models such as Apple’s iPhones fell short of achieving an “A” rating.

Starting 20 June 2025, all smartphones, tablets and feature phones sold in the European Union are must carry an energy label similar to those used for household appliances. This label is meant to inform consumers about six attributes of a device:

  1. Overall energy efficiency class, ranging from A (best) to G (worst)
  2. Battery life, based on a standardised test process
  3. Battery endurance, measured by the number of charging cycles
  4. Free-fall reliability
  5. Repairability class, rated from A to E
  6. Ingress protection rating

In future, these energy labels must be clearly displayed in both physical retail outlets and online shops, before consumers can purchase a product. Currently, the European Commission's registry contains 603 energy labels for smartphones and tablets. On this list, a total of 142 devices have been awarded the top rating, including the following

 

DeviceRatingBattery lifeBattery endurance in cyclesFree-fall reliabilityRepairabilityIP rating
Oscal Pilot 3A118h 45m800ACIP68
HMD SkylineA48h 30m800AAIP54
Blackview Zeno 1A166h 39m800CBIP20
Blackview BV8200A118h 45m800ABIP68
HMD Fusion X1A56h 31m800AAIP54
HMD PulseA60h800ABIP52
HMD Pulse ProA62h800ABIP52
Xiaomi 15A63h 26m1,000CCIP68
Poco F7 ProA70h 8m1,000CCIP68
Realme 14 Pro+A60h 43m1,000BBIP68
Poco F7 UltraA62h 53m1,000DCIP68
Blackview BL7000A118h 45m800ACIP68
Vivo Y19sA54h 28m1,000BBIP64
Xiaomi 15 UltraA58h 58m1,000CCIP68
Motorola Edge 60 ProA67h 47m1,000ABIP68
Motorola Razr 60 UltraA48h 48m1,000DBIP68


Perhaps unsurprisingly, the upper end of the spectrum is largely occupied by rugged outdoor smartphones with massive batteries, though several mainstream offerings, such as the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, also secured an “A” rating thanks to their excellent battery life, waterproof chassis and solid repairability. 

At the other end of the scale are devices with poor repairability, often also lacking any meaningful protection against water or impact. Notable examples include the Apple iPad Pro M4 (approx. $919 on Amazon), which, despite boasting a battery life of 67 hours and a respectable battery lifespan of 1,000 charge cycles, offers lacklustre repairability.

Similarly, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra received a “G” rating, much like many other iPad and Galaxy Tab models. The Xiaomi Pad 7 fared slightly better, earning an “F” rating. However, these labels can’t replace independent testing, as manufacturers themeslves are responsible for conducting the necessary assessments.
 

Apple iPad mini
Apple iPad mini
Apple iPad Pro (M4)
Apple iPad Pro (M4)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2025 06 > EU energy label: Here are the best- and worst-performing tablets and smartphones
Hannes Brecher, 2025-06-23 (Update: 2025-06-23)