Verdict - A good mid-range phone with long runtimes
Fans of slim and compact smartphones will surely find joy in the Pixel 9a, as its camera sits almost flush with the back of the device and although it has grown in size, it's still one of the most compact Android smartphones on the market.
Its display gets super bright, but it doesn't use high-frequency PWM dimming, and our test device's illumination isn't completely even. Although the Tensor G4 offers high peak performance within its price class, it's throttled severely in the long run. Furthermore, the small storage configuration is a little tight.
Even so, the Pixel 9a is a good mid-range smartphone with great battery life, an IP68 certification, wireless charging, eSIM support, and a long update delivery period. Its cameras on the back deliver good results, too.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
You can order the Pixel 9a directly via Google's online store.
Table of Contents
- Verdict - A good mid-range phone with long runtimes
- Specifications - Google Pixel 9a
- Case - The Pixel 9a is now IP68 certified
- Connectivity - Entry-level model with limited storage
- Software - 7 years of updates for the Pixel 9a
- Communication and GNSS - 6 GHz WLAN with the handbrake on
- Telephone functions and call quality
- Cameras - Strong photos on the Pixel 9a
- Accessories and warranty - Further slimmed-down scope of delivery
- Input devices and operation - The Pixel 9a with an optical fingerprint sensor
- Display - Bright pOLED at up to 120 Hz
- Performance - The Pixel 9a with the Tensor G4
- Games - Not always a stable 60fps
- Emissions - Poor cooling slows down the Pixel 9a
- Battery life - Large battery for long endurance
- Notebookcheck total rating
- Possible alternatives compared
The Google Pixel 9a follows in the Pixel 8a's footsteps and brings with it changes to its design as well as a larger display. Its battery has grown massively too, and the phone's SoC has been given an upgrade. Moreover, its protection against water has been improved.
Although it features new AI functions, these have been slimmed down a bit in comparison to the flagship models. The Google smartphone's prices have remained the same, with an MRSP of $499 (128 GB) and $599 (256 GB).
Specifications - Google Pixel 9a
Case - The Pixel 9a is now IP68 certified
The Google Pixel 9a is available in four colors: Iris (lilac), Poeny (coral), Porcelain (white) and Obsidian (black). Visually, it has gotten more angular, making it appear a little thicker despite its identical build height compared to the Pixel 8a. Its camera module is now smaller and flatter, protruding by only 0.55 millimeters from the case.
Its build quality is great thanks to all gaps being tight-fitting and even. There are only some slight irregularities between the back cover and the frame. The matte aluminum frame is resistant to fingerprints and feels nice to touch. When attempting to be twisted, the Pixel 9a appears solid, but it does creak slightly.
The Google phone is IP68-certified, so it's both dust-tight and waterproof. It uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 on the front—Google could have gone for a more modern and, as a result, more durable type of glass.
Connectivity - Entry-level model with limited storage
During our test, the Google Pixel 9a's USB port allowed wired image output (screen mirroring) and proved to be faster than its predecessor. It achieved just over 200 MB/s in the copying test, but could only be used in conjunction with a less energy-hungry Samsung Portable SSD T7. Its output power wasn't enough for a Samsung 980 Pro.
Buyers can choose between 128 and 256 GB of internal storage. In view of the price range in which the Pixel 9a operates, this seems too little to us, especially as users can't expand the phone's storage.
Software - 7 years of updates for the Pixel 9a
The Pixel 9a comes with Google Android 15 and, from launch, is set to be supplied with regular updates for seven years.
Gemini is now firmly integrated into the system and some AI-supported functions are part of the Pixel 9a. These include the camera features "Add Me" and "Best Shot". Macro focus, Magic Editor and Pixel Studio are now also on board.
The one-year free trial period for Gemini Advanced seems to be reserved for the Pro models. It's a shame that Google hasn't clearly indicated which functions only work in the cloud.
Sustainability
Google has provided a sustainability report for the Pixel 9a on its website. The outer packaging is completely plastic-free. In addition to recycled aluminum, the back of the phone also uses 81% recycled plastic. Based on its weight, the smartphone consists of 23% recycled materials.
Repair instructions and spare parts are provided and distributed via iFixit.
Communication and GNSS - 6 GHz WLAN with the handbrake on
The good news is that the Pixel 9a supports Wi-Fi 6E, which includes the 6 GHz frequency band. Unfortunately, however, it's only with 2x2 MIMO, so its transfer rates are no higher than when using conventional Wi-Fi 6.
The Pixel 9a features broad frequency support for cellular communications, so long-distance travel shouldn't be a problem. We noted no reception issues in a city environment.
Networking | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
The Pixel 9a only supports single-band GNSS, but its satellite locating abilities are both fast and precise outdoors. The situation looks different indoors, on the other hand. During our test, it then took a very long time to establish our location, which was very inaccurate, and the connection was lost from time to time.
We compared the Google phone with the Garmin Venu 2 on a bike trip. Although the 9a showed a few inaccuracies in this scenario, it should still be more than sufficient for navigation tasks.
Telephone functions and call quality
The Google Pixel 9a has space for a Nano SIM card as well as support for an eSIM, which can be used together in dual SIM operation. It also supports WLAN calls and VoLTE.
When held up to your ear, the Pixel 9a shows good call quality for voices as long as the ambient noise isn't too loud. A busy main road might be enough to stop the Pixel user from being intelligible. The hands-free mode is fine in quiet surroundings and even at a distance of 2 meters from the phone, we could be understood well during our test.
Cameras - Strong photos on the Pixel 9a
The front-facing camera boasts balanced color reproduction, a nice level of sharpness and good HDR properties. At best, you can record videos in Ultra HD at 30fps. The quality is good, but the subject isn't always in focus during fast movements.
Google has given its main camera a new sensor with a 48 MPix resolution, which is lower than the Pixel 8a—but the sensor in the Pixel 9a is larger. As a result of pixel binning, the photos are only 12 MPix in size and users don't have the option to use the full resolution on the 9a. The smartphone takes good photos and impresses with a high level of detail and balanced image compositions. Although the level of detail decreases in low light, the photos still leave a generally good impression.
The additional ultra-wide-angle lens delivers decent results, but gets blurry early on in the peripheral areas of close subjects (macro mode); this doesn't apply to panoramic shots. You can only zoom digitally on this phone. Up to 2x magnification, the shots look really good in daylight, but beyond this, artifacts become clearly visible. A maximum zoom of 8x is possible.
At best, the Pixel 9a records videos in Ultra HD at up to 60fps. If you limit yourself to 30fps, you can use both lenses for recording and switch between them while filming. The digital zoom is limited to 5x magnification.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-lightIn controlled lighting conditions, the Google Pixel 9a showed good color depiction without any major outliers. Light skin tones were shown with a bit of a red tint, and only when depicting cyan was its DeltaE value above 10. Our test chart remained rich in detail and sharp right into the edges.


Accessories and warranty - Further slimmed-down scope of delivery
The Google Pixel 9a comes with a USB-C cable and a SIM tool. Google has removed the OTG adapter, but you can still purchase it separately if needed. Google also offers cases and a matching power adapter via its website.
In the USA, the phone is covered by a standard 12-month warranty and cannot be extended or expanded.
Input devices and operation - The Pixel 9a with an optical fingerprint sensor
The Google Pixel 9a's capacitive touchscreen responds reliably and quickly to touch inputs. An optical fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display, which delivers reliable recognition rates and unlocks the smartphone quickly. In addition, users can make use of facial recognition via the front-facing camera, which quickly reaches its limits in the dark and is less reliable.
The phone's linear vibration motor provides crisp haptic feedback. The power button is pre-assigned with the digital assistant when pressed and held, but can also call up the classic menu. There is also a one-handed mode available.
Display - Bright pOLED at up to 120 Hz
The Pixel 9a's pOLED display has grown to 6.3 inches, which isn't only due to the fact that the smartphone as such has become slightly larger, but also as a result of its slightly narrower bezels.
Its resolution delivers a high pixel density and works with a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, but this can only be lowered to 60 Hz. The panel boasts a high brightness, but its illumination is only average. Still, this shouldn't be a negative factor during everyday use.
The 9a reached its peak brightness during the HDR test (2,679 cd/m²), but was barely darker when displaying a reduced white area (APL18: 2,653 cd/m²). We measured screen flickering at a fairly constant 240 Hz, which is probably due to PWM. Although the amplitude is flat, sensitive people should still expect some complaints.
|
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 1978 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 9a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 16e OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1" | Google Pixel 8a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -19% | 0% | -11% | 13% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 1978 | 1184 -40% | 1210 -39% | 1318 -33% | 833 -58% | 1518 -23% |
Brightness | 1775 | 1179 -34% | 1222 -31% | 1306 -26% | 837 -53% | 1466 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 76 | 99 30% | 92 21% | 98 29% | 99 30% | 88 16% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.7 -55% | 1 9% | 1.5 -36% | 0.7 36% | 1.2 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 3.2 -7% | 2.7 10% | 2.9 3% | 1.6 47% | 3.3 -10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.4 -9% | 1.5 32% | 2.3 -5% | 0.6 73% | 2 9% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6622 98% | 6544 99% | 6509 100% | 6819 95% | 6525 100% | 6786 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e |
Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16e |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 12.82 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).
Our Calman measurements attest to the Pixel 9a's accurate color reproduction, provided the profile Natural is used. Otherwise, its display is visibly cooler.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4405 ms rise | |
↘ 0.367 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4575 ms rise | |
↘ 0.474 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Performance - The Pixel 9a with the Tensor G4
The Pixel 9a shares the same chipset as the other smartphones in Google's 9-series, namely the Tensor G4. However, at 8 GB, the 9a has less RAM available. As a result, it was on par with its siblings, such as the Pixel 9, during our CPU test.
That being said, it performed weaker in the system benchmarks. For example, the Pixel 9 was 22% faster during PCMark and even 34% faster during Basemark OS II. The RAM in particular seemed to play a role here, as did the GPU. Even so, the Pixel 9a works smoothly during everyday use.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (35227 - 37104, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (n=1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (n=1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
The integrated ARM Mali-G715 MP7 is responsible for graphics calculations. It doesn't support ray tracing and appears to work somewhat slower than the nominally identical variants in the Pixel 9 Pro and co, but this can also be attributed to poorer cooling.
In comparison, it still offers high performance and was only surpassed by the iPhone 16e during our test.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
The browser benchmarks showed a mixed picture. While the Pixel 9a took second place in Octane 2.0 or Speedometer 3.0 as expected, it was surprisingly weak in other benchmarks.
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=156, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (102 - 117.5, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (182 - 248, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=138, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (14.7 - 15.8, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=104, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=150, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (90 - 112, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (52224 - 62374, n=5) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (699 - 1081, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) |
* ... smaller is better
The Google Pixel 9a's UFS 3.1 storage boasted high speeds during our test, but it could have been a little faster when it came to sequential writing.
Google Pixel 9a | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | Google Pixel 8a | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -23% | -1% | -30% | -7% | 45% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1688.82 | 1634.8 -3% | 992.72 -41% | 996.23 -41% | 1509.65 -11% | 1581 ? -6% | 2144 ? 27% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 853.5 | 999.95 17% | 931.68 9% | 970.63 14% | 255.31 -70% | 742 ? -13% | 1737 ? 104% |
Random Read 4KB | 241.03 | 207.01 -14% | 171.2 -29% | 255.89 6% | 165.98 -31% | 242 ? 0% | 293 ? 22% |
Random Write 4KB | 261.8 | 184.08 -30% | 186.14 -29% | 304.95 16% | 243.82 -7% | 238 ? -9% | 334 ? 28% |
Games - Not always a stable 60fps
We analyzed the gaming properties of the Pixel 9a using GameBench. In general, most games can be played smoothly, but PUBG Mobile, for example, showed that throttling under load also influenced its frame rates. The only strange thing was that the setting with the lowest detail level generated fewer frames than the HD setting.
Emissions - Poor cooling slows down the Pixel 9a
Temperature
The phone's surface temperatures are completely harmless in idle mode and don't rise to a critical value at any time, even under constant load.
During the stress tests with 3DMark, the Pixel 9a was revealed to have rather weak cooling performance, as the nominally fast SoC was slowed down considerably by the heat and was even slower or just as fast as an Exynos 1580 in the Galaxy A56 in the long term.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 8a |
Speakers
The smartphone's two speakers deliver a good sound, but seem a little weak at high volumes. The high tones are then too present and lack clarity.
Alternatively, you can output sound via USB. Bluetooth is available wirelessly but unfortunately, Google hasn't provided any information on which codecs are supported and prevents users from reading it out in the developer options. Though it will likely look similar to its predecessor. Auracast is not yet supported.
Google Pixel 9a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery life - Large battery for long endurance
Power consumption
The Google Pixel 9a has a particularly high power consumption when the display brightness is high, but this is due to its high luminosity without the ambient light sensor activated (1,188 cd/m²).
You can charge the Pixel 9a at a maximum of 23 watts via a cable and 7.5 watts wirelessly. Using a 125-watt power supply from Motorola (PD 2/3), it took 96 minutes to fully charge it during our test (50%: 31 mins, 80%: 54 mins, 90%: 69 mins).
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Google Pixel 9a 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 5110 mAh | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 16e 4005 mAh | Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh | Average Google Tensor G4 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 30% | 39% | 28% | 15% | 4% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.71 | 0.72 -1% | 1.07 -51% | 0.89 -25% | 0.68 4% | 0.92 -30% | 0.744 ? -5% | 0.869 ? -22% |
Idle Average * | 2.36 | 1.45 39% | 1.26 47% | 1.3 45% | 1.89 20% | 1.46 38% | 1.894 ? 20% | 1.427 ? 40% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.41 | 1.49 38% | 1.28 47% | 1.33 45% | 1.93 20% | 1.65 32% | 2.11 ? 12% | 1.588 ? 34% |
Load Average * | 8.24 | 9.68 -17% | 3.7 55% | 3.29 60% | 3.77 54% | 7.96 3% | 7.52 ? 9% | 7.16 ? 13% |
Load Maximum * | 15.36 | 13.39 13% | 7.52 51% | 4.76 69% | 9.04 41% | 10.74 30% | 18 ? -17% | 10.8 ? 30% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Runtimes
The Google Pixel 9a's runtimes were great during our test, clearly outperforming both its predecessor and the Pixel 9.
However, especially during the Wi-Fi test with the display brightness adjusted, the comparison field was somewhat closer and the gaps were smaller.
Google Pixel 9a 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 5110 mAh | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 16e 4005 mAh | Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | -24% | -7% | -2% | -31% | |
Reader / Idle | 2688 | 3173 18% | 1433 -47% | 2842 6% | 1803 -33% | |
H.264 | 1907 | 2506 31% | 1109 -42% | 1460 -23% | 1132 -41% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1273 | 1199 -6% | 1168 -8% | 1188 -7% | 1390 9% | 796 -37% |
Load | 242 | 215 -11% | 249 3% | 244 1% | 211 -13% |
Notebookcheck total rating
The Google Pixel 9a offers a strong overall package with a long update supply, high peak performance, a long-lasting battery and a good camera duo.
However, its bright display didn't fully evade our criticism during our test, its storage options are limited, and its charging speed isn't particularly fast.
Google Pixel 9a
- 06/17/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $599.00 Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An... 2. $5.99 Ferilinso 3 Pack Screen Prot... 3. $7.99 Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... List Price: 549€ | 185.9 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $5.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 3. $6.89 NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa... List Price: 479€ | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 2. $7.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... List Price: 530€ | 205 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Fhyeugfy for Nothing Phone (... 2. $7.99 Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... 3. $11.99 Ibywind For Nothing Phone (3... | 211 g | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED | ||
Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18 ⎘ Apple A18 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | Amazon: 1. $39.00 Apple iPhone 16e Silicone Ca... 2. $5.98 Ailun Screen Protector for i... 3. $9.99 iPhone 16e Car Charger USB C... List Price: 699 Euro | 167 g | 128 GB NVMe | 6.10" 2532x1170 460 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.