Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

Xiaomi Mix Flip review - Foldable smartphone with Leica cameras finally puts Samsung under pressure

Where did the crease go?

The Mix Flip brings a lot of what is currently possible with a compact foldable smartphone. Particularly the huge secondary display of the Xiaomi smartphone makes the Galaxy Flip 6 look a bit aged in comparison. But the rest of the equipment is also impressive for the first flip smartphone generation from Xiaomi.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Mark Riege) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Foldable Smartphone

With the Mix Flip, Xiaomi introduces an additional competitor to the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 into the market. A glance at the data sheet of the Mix Flip looks very promising, since the Flip smartphone from the Chinese manufacturer surpasses the Samsung smartphone in many regards. The highlight of the Mix Flip is the relatively large, almost bezel-less 4.01-inch secondary display with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, which even allows you to use (some) third-party apps. 

In contrast to its larger brother, the Mix Fold 4, friends of foldables should be pleased with the global availability of the Mix Flip outside of China. At an earlier press conference, Xiaomi Bulgaria had revealed that the flip smartphone will officially come to Europe. The global version of the compact foldable smartphone will be available starting September 26 at an MSRP of 1,299 Euros (~$1,456). In China, the basic version of the Mix Flip (12 GB RAM, 256 GB storage) is available for about 5,999 Yuan (~760 Euros or $852), with the top model with 16 GB RAM and 1 TB storage costing the equivalent of about 930 Euros (~$1,042). As an import, the prices start from about 850 Euros (~$953), which is relatively affordable for a foldable with this kind of equipment. 

Xiaomi Mix Flip (Mix Flip Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.86 inch 21.41:9, 2912 x 1224 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Schott UTG; 2nd screen: 4.01 inch 1.5K AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast, IP54
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78/n79; 4G: FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B66; TDD-LTE: B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48; 3G: WCDMA: B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19; 2G: B2/B3/B5/B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 167.5 x 74.02 ( = 0.3 x 6.59 x 2.91 in)
Battery
4780 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.7, 23 mm, OIS, 1/1.55 inch) + 50 MP (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47 mm), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 21 mm, 0.7µm, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: s, Keyboard: on, case, charger, info material, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1: GNSS: GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5), GLONASS (L1), QZSS (L1), and Beidou (B1, B2), fanless
Weight
190 g ( = 6.7 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 98 g ( = 3.46 oz / 0.22 pounds)
Price
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
83.3 %v8
09 / 2024
Xiaomi Mix Flip
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.86"2912x1224
80.2 %v8
09 / 2024
Honor Magic V Flip
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
193 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2520x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Nubia Flip 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
214 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2790x1188
84.7 %v8
09 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750
187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
80.4 %v8
08 / 2024
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735
189 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"2640x1080

Note that we have updated our rating system and that the results from version 8 are not compatible with those from version 7. You can find additional information on this here.

Case - Xiaomi Mix Flip with IP54

At a weight of 190 grams (~6.7 oz) and thickness of 7.6 millimeters (~0.3 in), the Mix Flip is slightly heavier and thicker than a Galaxy Z Flip6, although the differences are negligible in everyday operation. What can be more serious depending on your usage scenario is the lack of an IPX8 certification, which means that the case won't be waterproof. However, using the flip smartphone from Xiaomi during rainfall shouldn't cause any problems with its IP54 rating. 

Xiaomi Mix Flip in black
Xiaomi Mix Flip in black
Xiaomi Mix Flip in the nylon fiber edition
Xiaomi Mix Flip in the nylon fiber edition
Xiaomi Mix Flip in purple
Xiaomi Mix Flip in purple

The case is protected by the inhouse Longjing glass, internationally also called Xiaomi Shield Glass - with the nylon fiber version correspondingly only using this on the front. The workmanship is first rate, and with its metal frame, the Mix Flip offers a high-quality feel when holding it in the hand. Due to the matted back, fingerprints are not a problem - except on the aluminum hinge with a high-gloss finish between the exterior and interior of the smartphone. 

The bezels around the foldable OLED panel turn out slightly slimmer than in the Galaxy Flip 6. Expressed in numbers, the display to surface ratio of the foldable OLED display inside the Mix Flip is 87.5%, while the Samsung model only offers 85.5%. The large 4.01-inch external display of the Xiaomi smartphone also looks significantly more modern. In terms of durability, Xiaomi advertises about 500,000 folding operations for its flexible Schott UTG display. What is remarkable is that the crease is hardly noticeable anymore, not even by touch. 

Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

Size Comparison - opened

171.4 mm / 6.75 in 74 mm / 2.91 in 7.1 mm / 0.2795 in 189 g0.4167 lbs170 mm / 6.69 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 7.3 mm / 0.2874 in 214 g0.4718 lbs167.5 mm / 6.59 in 74.02 mm / 2.91 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 190 g0.4189 lbs167.3 mm / 6.59 in 75.6 mm / 2.98 in 7.15 mm / 0.2815 in 193 g0.4255 lbs165.1 mm / 6.5 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 187 g0.4123 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Size Comparison - closed

88 mm / 3.46 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 15.5 mm / 0.61 in 214 g0.4718 lbs85.6 mm / 3.37 in 74.02 mm / 2.91 in 15.99 mm / 0.63 in 192 g0.4233 lbs86.5 mm / 3.41 in 75.6 mm / 2.98 in 14.89 mm / 0.586 in 193 g0.4255 lbs85.1 mm / 3.35 in 71.9 mm / 2.83 in 14.9 mm / 0.587 in 187 g0.4123 lbs

Equipment - Xiaomi smartphone only with USB 2.0

With Bluetooth 5.4, dual-SIM, stereo speakers, an IR blaster, and NFC for contactless payment, the Mix Flip offers a very good feature set. The RAM is specified as LPDDR5X and the storage as UFS 4.0. Since there is no storage expansion via microSD card, those who temporarily need more space can save data onto external storage media such as USB sticks via USB-OTG. 

The fact that the USB connection still uses the 2.0 standard doesn't quite fit with the image of a foldable smartphone without any compromises. It is unfortunate for this price class, since it prevents wired image output. However, you can still output the display contents to an external monitor wirelessly via Miracast. 

Connected storage media can be formatted as FAT, FAT32, or exFAT. Xiaomi also supports reading and writing of data media for NTFS. Our copy test with a connected external M2.SSD drive unfortunately fails, since the USB port doesn't recognize our Samsung 980 Pro SSD. This is probably due to the connection not offering a sufficiently high power output. 

Hinge
Hinge
Left case side
Left case side
Right case side (keys: on/off/ volume)
Right case side (keys: on/off/ volume)
Top/bottom case side (microphones, SIM slot, IR blaster, USB port, speaker)
Top/bottom case side (microphones, SIM slot, IR blaster, USB port, speaker)

Software - Foldable with Android 14

The Mix Flip comes with the inhouse HyperOS, which is based on the current Android 14. As is customary for the Chinese versions of the Xiaomi smartphones, our test unit doesn't support any Google Services or the Play Store in the state of delivery. Chinese and Xiaomi's own services are used instead. However, the Google Frameworks are already preinstalled in the state of delivery, so that you only have to manually install the Play Store.

In terms of software updates, Xiaomi holds back on specifications available on the Chinese internet (according to our understanding using Google Translate). For the current Xiaomi 14 generation, four years of Android upgrades and five years of security patches are specified. We assume that the global Mix series will get similar updates, but it is uncertain how long the Chinese ROM will be supported. At the time of this test, the foldable uses the security patches from August 2024. While the delivery speed of patches is often better with the Chinese ROM than with the global version of HyperOS, it is unlikely that Xiaomi will operate at the level of Google or Samsung with its Mix series.     

Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

Sustainability

In addition to more information on the software updates, with the global introduction of the Mix Fip, Xiaomi could also offer some specifications on the materials used and their recycling quote. But at this point, we lack this information. The packaging of the foldable smartphone appears to be mostly free of plastic. The device itself is wrapped in foil, but the rest of the packaging is made of cardboard.  

Communication and GNSS - Xiaomi Mix Flip with 5G

In your network at home, the Xiaomi smartphone can use WiFi 7 including MU-MIMO support, but the Mix Flip can only use the 2.4 and 5-GHz ranges for creating a connection - at least with the Chinese version that we are testing. Without the 6-GHz band, we determine transfer rates of about 1,000 Mbit/s in combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router. In terms of stability and constancy of the wireless transmission, there is little to complain about.

For mobile internet access, the foldable phone supports 5G network access and offers a wide selection of supported frequency bands, with the same going for the LTE standard. Even band 20 and 28 (needed in Germany) are already included in the Chinese version. Users in German speaking countries are well-equipped with this. Even though you should still check which frequency bands are needed before traveling abroad, with 22 4G and 18 5G bands, you should be able to use the Mix Flip in most countries without any trouble.  

Networking
Xiaomi Mix Flip
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 784) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1001 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic V Flip
iperf3 receive AXE11000
898 (min: 631) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
716 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼72%
Nubia Flip 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
986 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
623 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1816 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼81%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
649 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
944 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
736 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1381 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1400 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (450-756)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (782-985)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø963 (784-992)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1001 (904-1017)
Locating outdoors
Locating outdoors
Locating indoors
Locating indoors

The Xiaomi smartphone uses the main satellite systems to locate its position: GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, QZSS, and Beidou, most in dual-band. To evaluate the locating accuracy in practice, we take the Mix Flip with us on a bike trip. For comparison, we also take a Garmin Venu 2 to record the route.

The deviations between the route recordings are small, although we prefer the recording of the route details by the Garmin smartwatch overall. But often the recorded routes are exactly the same. The foldable smartphone will therefore be able to serve very well for navigation tasks in everyday operation.

Garmin Venu 2 vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip
Garmin Venu 2 vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip

Phone Functions and Voice Quality - Xiaomi smartphone without WLAN calling

Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

The Mix Flip offers full dual-SIM support with two Nano-SIM card slots. However, the system doesn't support an eSIM - not even in the global version. While VoLTE is supported, VoWiFi is not.

Through the earpiece, the voice quality is attractive, and our voice is also transferred cleanly. While it sounds slightly duller through the speaker, it still works well at a moderate distance to the phone.

Cameras - Flip smartphone with tele lens

Selfie taken with the 32-MP camera
Selfie taken with the 32-MP camera
Selfie taken with the main camera
Selfie taken with the main camera

Like the Xiaomi 14 generation, the Mix Flip also enjoys the fruits of the cooperation with Leica in both software and hardware. Particularly the "Master Lens System" is supposed to allow for an authentic Leica image creation. Thanks to the foldable form factor, the cover screen should allow you to take pictures and videos with the main cameras in the back, which might be an interesting feature for selfie fans. In addition, the 32-MP lens inside also takes reasonable pictures without pixel binning computations, although there is only a fixed focus available here and the exposure leaves room for improvement. 

In the back, Xiaomi uses a 50-MP main camera with a light sensitive Leica Summilux lens (f/1.7). In daylight, the OmniVision sensor (OVX8000) creates attractive pictures with a good sharpness. The dynamic is high, but some shady areas are more emphasized than with the foldable competitors.

In darkness, the relatively small sensor size (1/1.55") becomes noticeable in the pictures taken with the Mix Flip. On the other hand, its low light capabilities are still significantly better than those of the Honor Magic V Flip. But the Galaxy Z Flip6 also shows that with an ISOCELL GN3 of almost identical size (1/1.57"), visibly more sharpness and details are possible. 

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20x (max)
20x (max)
Macro
Macro

The additional 50-MP tele lens with a focus length of 47mm (similar to a compact camera) is a disappointment. Xiaomi uses a segment of the OmniVision OV60A, which offers a native resolution of 60 MP. Using the lossless 2x zoom, we still like the pictures, but as soon as digital processing is added, the images appear artificial and offer hardly any details. The extent of the problem becomes apparent when we take a look at our comparison picture taken with the Galaxy Flip 6 without a tele lens. In addition, the 50-MP sensor also serves as a macro lens, since Xiaomi didn't add an ultrawide angle camera to its flip smartphone.

Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

Videos can be recorded in 720p, 1080p, or 2160p at a maximum of 4K30. You can also make time lapse recordings with both lenses on the back at up to 960 fps in 1080p. In contrast to the main camera (OIS + EIS), the tele lens only uses electronic image stabilization.  

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightZoom 5x

We analyze the color reproduction of the main camera in the lab under controlled light conditions and compare it to the actual reference colors. Even though we see some noticeable brightening of the Mix Flip here, the camera software is very satisfactory overall, ensuring low color deviations in the ColorChecker Passport. The only real outliers in the color accuracy (>10) are noticeable in green and cyan color tones. 

ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Flip: 7.81 ∆E min: 1.92 - max: 13.09 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Flip: 8.04 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 15.25 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Xiaomi Mix Flip with Case

Xiaomi Mix Flip with the optional printer
Xiaomi Mix Flip with the optional printer

The box includes a 67W quick charger (5V/3A, 5-20V/6.2-3.25A), a data and charging cable (USB-C to USB-C, 2.0), a SIM tool, and quick start instructions. Both displays are covered by a preinstalled protective foil, and a color-coordinated case cover is also included. In addition, Trading Shenzhen who provided us with our test unit, also includes an EU adapter for the charger as well as an USB-OTG adapter with our Chinese version of the smartphone.

Our import device comes with a 12-month warranty. If a warranty case occurs, Trading Shenzhen also offers the option (in Germany) to send the phone to a German address for repair. 

Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

Input Devices and Operation - Foldable smartphone with Face Unlock

Flex mode, an expanded folded display option known from Samsung, is also supported by the Mix Flip.
Flex mode, an expanded folded display option known from Samsung, is also supported by the Mix Flip.

The operation of both Mix Flip displays is very accurate and appears comfortably fluid due to their high refresh rate of 120 Hz. This impression is also supported by a crisp vibration motor (X axis) and touch scan rate of 240 Hz, as well as a triple certification from the (German) TÜV Rheinland for low blue light, being flicker free, and circadian friendly. The latter certification is only valid for the large main display.

Since you can also use the external display for many tasks, you don't necessarily have to open the main display of the Mix Flip. You can view some apps, even third-party apps, look at emails or notifications, respond to them, or use the cameras for vlogging. 

While the hinge of the Mix Flip allows using it partially folded at a 90-degree angle, almost stepless opening at any angle as in the Galaxy Flip models is not possible. Similar to Samsung, HyperOS also supports expanded display options for some apps in half-folded position. 

A capacitive fingerprint sensor in the power button is available for biometric security. It responds quickly, recognizing the finger accurately most of the time. Only its position is a bit high. Both the punch hole camera when opened and the main camera in folded state allow biometric identification via the face, although the 2D face recognition used here is considered very insecure.

Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

Display - Mix Flip uses LTPO OLED

The OLED displays use an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue, and two green light diodes.
The OLED displays use an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue, and two green light diodes.

The main display has a 6.86-inch diagonal in the stretched format of 21.4:9. Even though a flexible POLED panel from TLC (CSOT, 12 Bit) is used, you don't have to accept any technology compromises compared to a classical smartphone. The display uses the LTPO technology, which allows for an adaptive refresh rate of 1 to 120 Hz. The pixel density also turns out very high with 460 ppi.

The Mix Flip supports a very wide range of HDR standards (HDR10, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision), and at 2,890 cd/m², our brightness measurement when playing 4K video material is not only close to the manufacturer's specifications (3,000 nits) but also sufficiently bright for first-rate HDR effects.

The APL18 measurement with dark areas on a white background, which is more relevant in everyday operation, reaches 1,561 cd/m², which is also very good. On the other hand, the maximum brightness with a pure white display and activated brightness sensor only reaches about 950 cd/m². 

947
cd/m²
945
cd/m²
954
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
949
cd/m²
962
cd/m²
948
cd/m²
944
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 962 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 949 cd/m² Minimum: 2.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 949 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Mix Flip
AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9"
Honor Magic V Flip
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"
Nubia Flip 5G
OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"
Screen
47%
43%
14%
35%
Brightness middle
949
1529
61%
1164
23%
1210
28%
1099
16%
Brightness
949
1535
62%
1172
23%
1221
29%
1087
15%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
97
-1%
98
0%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
1.3
38%
0.7
67%
3.1
-48%
1.04
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.6
2.1
62%
1.5
73%
4.2
25%
2.36
58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
1.5
61%
1.1
71%
2
47%
1.1
71%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.05 107%
2.199 100%
CCT
6826 95%
6303 103%
6482 100%
6666 98%
6418 101%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi uses PWM to control the display brightness, which brings the typical display flickering. Although the Mix Flip doesn't use the same high frequency (3,840 Hz) as the Xiaomi 14 smartphones, the flickering also comes at a high frequency (2,160 Hz). We can confirm this with our measurements (1,923 Hz). The visually noticeable variations in the light density should still be perceived as eye-friendly by sensitive users, even though the panel shows a basic backlight strobing (BFI) that is low at 120 Hz. The amplitude in the Oscilloscope is very even across the whole brightness spectrum, and the amplitude depth is fairly flat at 16.5%.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 16.53 %
Secondary Frequency: 1923 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
maximum manual display brightness
100%

Measurement series at a fixed zoom level and various brightness settings (Although the amplitude at minimum brightness looks flat, this is due to the scaling. You can see the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness in the info box.)

In our tests with the CalMAN software and spectral photometer, the OLED display of the foldable smartphone appears to be well calibrated, although we still see some slight deviations in the grayscale. The Delta-E values remain within the ideal range (<3) only for colors. 

In its software, the Mix Flip scores with extensive adjustment options. In addition to four color profiles, you can also select an "Advanced" mode, allowing you to adjust not only the color temperature but also individual parameters such as the saturation or color space. You can also use the larger DCI-P3 color space.

Color Accuracy (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)
Color Accuracy (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)
Color Space (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)
Color Space (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)
Saturation (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)
Saturation (Profile: Original, Warm; Target Color Space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6595 ms rise
↘ 0.5425 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9075 ms rise
↘ 0.72 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Outdoors, the two contrast-rich displays leave a confident impression, remaining easily readable in most light situations. But you might still encounter some slight limitations of the readability on sunny days due to reflections. From steep viewing angles, the brightness drops slightly, although we don't notice any color changes or colored veil. 

Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Viewing angles of the Xiaomi Mix Flip
Viewing angles of the Xiaomi Mix Flip

Cover Display - Mix Flip with large OLED panel

The external display panel measures 4.01 inch with a format ratio of 10.37:9. Compared to the display inside, you hardly have to accept any compromises in terms of viewability. The pixel density (460 ppi), top brightness (3,000 nits), and refresh rate (120 Hz) as well as the eye-friendly technology (high-frequency PWM) are identical. Our measurements (HDR: 2,990 cd/m²) are also very similar to those of the main display. Only the LTPO technology is not available, and we only change between 120 Hz and 60 Hz in the test, depending on the displayed content. 

The OLED display uses an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue, and two green light diodes.
The OLED display uses an RG/BG sub-pixel matrix consisting of one red, one blue, and two green light diodes.
PWM flickering (measurement at minimum display brightness)
PWM flickering
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review
Xiaomi Mix Flip
AMOLED, 1392x1208, 4"
Honor Magic V Flip
OLED, 1200x1092, 4"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Super AMOLED, 720x748, 3.4"
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
1272x1080, 4"
Screen
Brightness middle
945
1559
993
972
Black Level *
Brightness
994
966
Brightness Distribution
95
96
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.84
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.62
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
Gamma
2.138 103%
CCT
6579 99%

* ... smaller is better

minimum display brightness
min.
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
maximum manual display brightness
100%

Measurement series at a fixed zoom level and various brightness settings (Although the amplitude at minimum brightness looks flat, this is due to the scaling. You can see the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness in the info box.)

Performance - Xiaomi smartphone uses an SoC from Qualcomm

Xiaomi uses a powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 with a steam chamber cooling system for its foldable smartphone. In our benchmark package, the Mix Flip places slightly behind the Galaxy Flip6 in Geekbench 6, especially in the single-core test. In the system benchmark, the Xiaomi smartphone delivers very good results. The same is not the case in our AI tests, where the Mix Flip often places last. 

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=26)
2113 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2072 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1911 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1848 Points -3%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1700 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1607 Points -16%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1016 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=26)
6596 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6354 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6099 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4631 Points -24%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4630 Points -24%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4277 Points -30%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2885 Points -53%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1343 - 1702, n=17)
1651 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1343 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329 Points -1%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1252 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2437, n=149, last 2 years)
1143 Points -15%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=17)
6007 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5675 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3997 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3980 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (550 - 8816, n=149, last 2 years)
3880 Points -32%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=22)
1920710 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1705950 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1492419 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)
1333864 Points -22%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1162599 Points -32%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1142944 Points -33%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18983 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18121 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 25683, n=25)
17965 Points -5%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17105 Points -10%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15809 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
14293 Points -25%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11666 Points -39%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1444 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1243 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (951 - 1474, n=18)
1236 Points -1%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1050 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=146, last 2 years)
1041 Points -16%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
771 Points -38%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
683 Points -45%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8088 - 10966, n=20)
9839 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9267 Points -8%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7751 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=152, last 2 years)
7046 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5685 Points -44%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4805 Points -52%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15600 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14569 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=20)
13713 Points -6%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12407 Points -15%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11852 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=152, last 2 years)
10842 Points -26%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
10293 Points -29%
Memory
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12476 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=20)
10692 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9230 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=152, last 2 years)
7914 Points -37%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7881 Points -37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5966 Points -52%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4856 Points -61%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=20)
33396 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
29711 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
26269 Points -12%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
22976 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=152, last 2 years)
22829 Points -23%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8020 Points -73%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7680 Points -74%
Web
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1973 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1950 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=20)
1948 Points -1%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1760 Points -11%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1682 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=152, last 2 years)
1634 Points -17%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1389 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=143, last 2 years)
18691 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=20)
16229 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15793 Points +37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15572 Points +36%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12674 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11487 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
239813 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
229987 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
147801 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=17)
97396 Points -58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=128, last 2 years)
26916 Points -88%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
946 Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points +351%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4122, n=41, last 2 years)
600 Points +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (243 - 489, n=8)
372 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
343 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
279 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32120, n=41, last 2 years)
2301 Points +871%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1239 Points +423%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (227 - 498, n=8)
365 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
326 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
237 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44381, n=41, last 2 years)
3413 Points +530%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2576 Points +375%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (508 - 1128, n=8)
817 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
715 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
542 Points

In the graphics test, the foldable smartphone achieves very competitive results with its Adreno 750, although the Galaxy Z Flip6 still performs significantly better at times in the 3DMark tests. On the other hand, the Mix Flip performs at the level of the Samsung smartphone in the GFXBench. 

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4739 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3991 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2778 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1659 Points -58%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4912 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3967 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2823 Points -29%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1723 Points -57%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
819 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18949 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15108 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11056 Points -27%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6661 Points -56%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3136 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6496 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3124 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8046 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6788 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3223 Points -53%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7270 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6765 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2799 Points -59%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1268 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1232 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
579 Points -53%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1243 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
872 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
739 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5071 Points +27%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4329 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3980 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3911 Points -2%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3243 Points -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23452 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16131 Points -31%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12176 Points -48%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6893 Points -71%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11622 Points -2%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10865 Points -9%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7553 Points -36%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6091 Points -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
450 fps 0%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
292 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
344 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
312 fps -9%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
216 fps -37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
248 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
245 fps -1%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps -31%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +28%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -11%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -39%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -12%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +28%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -16%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -26%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -78%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -14%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps -38%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -42%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -78%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -29%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -36%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps -40%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -49%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps -77%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -38%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12 fps -68%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.5 fps -80%

When surfing with the Chrome browser, the Mix Flip impresses with fast load times, and the Xiaomi smartphone also reaches solid values in the benchmark tests.  

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
191.085 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
167.118 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=24)
156.7 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=156, last 2 years)
141.4 Points +24%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
133.319 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
113.865 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
281 runs/min +25%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
247 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
224 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=19)
214 runs/min -4%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=138, last 2 years)
179.9 runs/min -20%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
174 runs/min -22%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
13.5 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
13 runs/min -4%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
12.7 runs/min -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=104, last 2 years)
12.7 runs/min -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 18.9, n=14)
12.6 runs/min -7%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
10.9 runs/min -19%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
184 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
181 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
178 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=20)
158.7 Points -11%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
139 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=150, last 2 years)
132.7 Points -25%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
72835 Points +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=24)
52142 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
44560 Points +33%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
40904 Points +22%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
39446 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
33543 Points
Nubia Flip 5G (Chrome 124)
22047 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)
1303 ms * -58%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
906.5 ms * -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (510 - 2066, n=22)
833 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
822.6 ms *
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
638.8 ms * +22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
574.7 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

In terms of its storage connection, the Mix Flip is really able to score, and particularly the write rates of the UFS 4.0 storage are very strong. 

Xiaomi Mix FlipHonor Magic V FlipNubia Flip 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GMotorola Razr 50 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-44%
-58%
-17%
-6%
-13%
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
4063.4
1947.4
-52%
967.4
-76%
3930.68
-3%
4012
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
3332.67
1672.06
-50%
766.69
-77%
2603.84
-22%
3512
5%
2724 ?(555 - 3484, n=39)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
367.24
277.55
-24%
263.87
-28%
445.5
21%
340
-7%
Random Write 4KB
587.21
297.97
-49%
295.55
-50%
202.97
-65%
457
-22%

Games - Xiaomi Mix Flip not suitable for gamers

To evaluate the graphics performance of the Adreno GPU in everyday operation, we take a look at two games from the Play Store using the software from our partner GameBench. To summarize the results, the foldable smartphone is not really suited for more intensive gaming. 

The demanding Genshin Impact can be played briefly at 60 fps at high details, but due to the noticeable heat development, the frame rate is already reduced after a short time. We reach a plateau at around 40 fps, and this value remains the same even after reducing the graphics. We don't see any recovery to 60 frames per second. If you use the Max Flip outdoors in summer temperatures and at full display brightness, you probably won't even get the 40 fps on average.  

In PUBG Mobile, a constant 60 fps are possible at low details. We are unable to enable the 90-fps mode. Surprisingly, the same also goes for the UHD mode. In the HD setting, the "typical" 60 fps of a smartphone with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 are also not possible, but only 40 fps instead. A lack of software optimization is probably at fault, since the heat development remains within limits with the shooter game. 

Geshin Impact
Geshin Impact
PUBG mobile
PUBG mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø39.5 (35-43)
Xiaomi Mix Flip; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø54.1 (38-61)
Xiaomi Mix Flip; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58 (54-60)
Xiaomi Mix Flip; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.8 (35-41)

Emissions - Flip smartphone heats up unevenly

Temperatures

In everyday operation, the cooling system of the small foldable is easily able to manage the surface temperatures of the case. But in our Burnout benchmark, we measure some pronounced heat development above 46 ºC (115 ºF) in the area of the cameras. In the Wild Life Stress Tests of 3DMark, the heat development also leads to some moderate to high throttling of the system performance by about 30 to 45%.

Max. Load
 46.4 °C
116 F
45.6 °C
114 F
33.9 °C
93 F
 
 46.1 °C
115 F
44.9 °C
113 F
32.4 °C
90 F
 
 45.8 °C
114 F
45 °C
113 F
32.3 °C
90 F
 
Maximum: 46.4 °C = 116 F
Average: 41.4 °C = 107 F
32.1 °C
90 F
41 °C
106 F
42.7 °C
109 F
31.4 °C
89 F
42 °C
108 F
42.9 °C
109 F
30.9 °C
88 F
40.4 °C
105 F
42.9 °C
109 F
Maximum: 42.9 °C = 109 F
Average: 38.5 °C = 101 F
Power Supply (max.)  29.1 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 20.9 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +79%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94.4 % +70%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 % +1%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43.6 % -22%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +68%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 % +31%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 %
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.8 % -7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.7 % -36%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.6 % -7%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.2 % -17%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.8 % +21%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73.5 %
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.1 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -32%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.4 (14.6-24.8)
Honor Magic V Flip Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.9 (8.89-16.2)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.96 (4.91-4.98)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.5 (10.8-28.5)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.1 (9.79-12.7)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (48.5-87.1)
Honor Magic V Flip Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40 (34.5-61.7)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.7-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44.5 (37.7-86.5)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø37.4 (37.2-39.4)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.2 (13.7-22.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14.4 (12.7-22.5)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø10.4 (8.49-16.9)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.2 (7.4-10.1)
Honor Magic V Flip Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø4.64 (4.44-6.24)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø6.95 (5.81-11.7)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø4.2 (3.91-4.4)

Speakers

The Flip Mix uses a dual-speaker system with Dolby Atmos support. The Xiaomi smartphone is unable to reproduce bass sounds, and our Pink Noise measurement also shows a rather uneven frequency curve.  

If you want to use external sound devices, you can either connect them to the USB port or wirelessly using Bluetooth 5.4 including Auracast. The selection of supported codecs is very extensive with AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 1-5, and LC3.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.436.82534.135.63126.927.44034.332.45037.436.76324.930.98020.628.310024.529.712517.636.716015.844.520011.645.92501052.131514.356.34007.959.35006.566.46308.169.58008.669.2100010.575.912508.780.816009.876.720009.272.125009.47431509.878.740009.382.850009.579.4630010.375.4800010.872100001170.61250011.166.11600010.861.3SPL22.389.2N0.475median 10median 70.6Delta1.79.731.837.330.838.825.539.121.533.831.337.128.237.916.53918.835.61641.217.952.815.95415.556.416.3591460.815.36515.469.51574.515.277.414.278.51576.314.279.914.281.615.58214.282.714.178.915.574.614.47614.173.815.769.214.166.926.990.80.883.1median 15.2median 74.50.89.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mix FlipSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mix Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Xiaomi smartphone with a large battery

Power Consumption

With a capacity of 4,780 mAh, the battery of the Mix Flip is significantly larger than that of the Galaxy Z Flip6 and can also be fast charged at up to 67 watts. Using the included charger, it takes less than 45 minutes to recharge the battery, with more than 50% reached after about 20 minutes. If you don't always want to use an adapter with the Chinese version, you can also use the usual quick chargers (QC 2-4, PD2.0, PD3.0, PPS) with the Xiaomi smartphone. However, wireless charging is not supported.

The power consumption during idle operation is very good at less than 1 Watt. Under load, the power consumption is slightly above the level of a Galaxy Z Flip6 or Magic V Flip.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.5 / 0.92 / 1.1 Watt
Load midlight 7.66 / 9.03 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mix Flip
4780 mAh
Honor Magic V Flip
4800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-39%
-2%
-28%
-43%
-37%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
0.94
-88%
0.51
-2%
0.7
-40%
0.929 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=20)
-86%
Idle Average *
0.92
1.69
-84%
1.18
-28%
1.1
-20%
1.374 ?(0.81 - 2.11, n=20)
-49%
Idle Maximum *
1.1
1.77
-61%
1.21
-10%
1.5
-36%
1.54 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=20)
-40%
Load Average *
7.66
6.63
13%
6.23
19%
8.5
-11%
8.82 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=19)
-15%
Load Maximum *
9.03
6.96
23%
8.01
11%
12
-33%
11.5 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=19)
-27%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.38 (0.74-8.99)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.45 (0.744-15.2)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.607 (0.541-0.757)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.834 (0.786-1.104)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.95 (8.9-9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.66 (6.16-6.71)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.607 (0.541-0.757)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.834 (0.786-1.104)

Battery Life

With almost 15 hours in our realistic WLAN test at a display brightness adjusted to 150 cd/m², the battery life is at the same level as that of the foldable competitors. Only the Honor Magic V Flip lasts noticeably longer. Considering the battery life of the Galaxy Flip 6, the Mix Flip should still offer some potential for software optimizations, due to its high battery capacity.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 15min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 128)
14h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 06min
Xiaomi Mix Flip
4780 mAh
Honor Magic V Flip
4800 mAh
Nubia Flip 5G
4310 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
13%
6%
4%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1995
1860
-7%
1526
-24%
H.264
1143
1373
20%
1022
-11%
WiFi v1.3
893
1159
30%
951
6%
929
4%
726
-19%
Load
246
267
9%
274
11%

Pros

+ very bright displays
+ flexible OLED without noticeable crease
+ fast storage and powerful SoC
+ good equipment
+ fast charging with included charger

Cons

- high throttling
- gaming weakness due to high heat development
- tele camera
- uncertain update policies (CN ROM)
- no wireless charging

Verdict on the Xiaomi Mix Flip

Testing the Xiaomi Mix Flip. Test unit provided by TradingShenzhen
Testing the Xiaomi Mix Flip. Test unit provided by TradingShenzhen

The first flip phone generation from Xiaomi has wet our appetite. Although the Mix Flip doesn't completely fulfil the very positive promises of its data sheet in everyday operation, the small foldable from the Chinese manufacturer comes close overall to the top of the class, the Galaxy Z Flip6. Even if the global version of the Mix Flip is priced less attractively than an import of the Chinese version, Samsung finally gets some serious competition in the flip phone segment.

Particularly in terms of visual appearance, Xiaomi does many things right. Both the bright foldable OLED panel and the relatively large secondary display outside offer very small display bezels and with this a modern design. While we would have expected an even better battery life considering the large battery, the runtimes of the Mix Flip aren't bad at all. However, those who are looking for a better battery life might find some interesting reading in our test of the Magic V Flip.

The cameras brought some slight disappointment, since the two Leica lenses weren't always performing convincingly in everyday operation. While on paper, the tele lens promises significantly better zoom qualities than the competitors, our test pictures gave a different impression. On the other hand, the included accessories are laudable: The box of the Mix Flip not only includes the corresponding quick charger, but also a good-quality case.      

With the Mix Flip that will hopefully also be available in Germany soon, the flip phone segment can finally pick up the pace. We have high hopes for the coming second generation of the Xiaomi foldable.  

Price and Availability

The Xiaomi Mix Flip is currently available as an import from vendors such as Trading Shenzhen for ~$952. The global version should become available starting from September 26 at an MSRP of 1,299 Euros (~$1,456) in Europe. 

Note that we have updated our rating system and that the results from version 8 are not compatible with those from version 7. You can find additional information on this here.

Xiaomi Mix Flip - 09/24/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
52 / 69 → 76%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
89%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 68%
Application Performance
73 / 85 → 86%
AI Performance
27%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
76%
Average
66%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
96.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
44.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Mix Flip review - Foldable smartphone with Leica cameras finally puts Samsung under pressure
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-09-26 (Update: 2024-09-26)